Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

State leadership


Guest Kent Smith

Recommended Posts

We have a state association of a president, VP, appointed Treasurer, 5 chapter members and 4 members at large with two year terms and voting rights. Also we have a past president's position is for one year, with voting rights of that one year. When that past president is off the BOD, we have an even number of voting members, is this acceptable per RR of O?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 When that past president is off the BOD, we have an even number of voting members, is this acceptable per RR of O?

 

Yes.  RONR has no rule about how many people should be on a board or whether the number should be odd or even.  Regardless of how many people  are on the board, there will often.... maybe usually.... be one or more absent, so you never know whether you will have an even or odd number of people in actual attendance.  In addition, since it  takes a majority vote to adopt most motions, a tie vote simply fails.  No problem.  You're not in limbo.  The motion simply failed to get a majority vote.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is the position of Past President being eliminated here?

 

Not necessarily, if the current president serves for more than one year and the (immediate) past president serves, ex officio, on the board for only one year, then the (immediate) past president can be off the board (even though he's still the immediate past president).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

We have a state association of a president, VP, appointed Treasurer, 5 chapter members and 4 members at large with two year terms and voting rights. Also we have a past president's position is for one year, with voting rights of that one year. When that past president is off the BOD, we have an even number of voting members, is this acceptable per RR of O?

 

Is the position of Past President being eliminated here?

 

Not necessarily, if the current president serves for more than one year and the (immediate) past president serves, ex officio, on the board for only one year, then the (immediate) past president can be off the board (even though he's still the immediate past president).

I agree with Edgar's rationale.  Although it's possible the position of past president is being eliminated, I think it is more likely that this organization, which elects its officers for two year terms, wants the past president to serve on the board for only one year, meaning the membership of the board drops by one when the past president comes off the board.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...