LSCHelper Posted January 12, 2017 at 08:15 PM Report Share Posted January 12, 2017 at 08:15 PM Hello, On page 448, line 13 thru 15, it is stated that "an officer who has served more than half a term is considered to have served a full term". My question is what is the value or impact of being "considered" to have served a full term. Jerry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Brown Posted January 12, 2017 at 08:54 PM Report Share Posted January 12, 2017 at 08:54 PM 32 minutes ago, LSCHelper said: My question is what is the value or impact of being "considered" to have served a full term. Jerry Assume that your bylaws provide that officers may not serve more than two consecutive terms. In addition, assume that the terms are for one year. Your secretary resigns and the body elects Jane to complete her term. If there are less than six months remaining in the original term, Jane would be eligible to serve two full terms in her own right after completing the partial term. However, if there are more than six months remaining in the unfinished term, Jane would be able to serve only one full term in her own right. The term she is completing for the secretary who resigned is considered a full term since more than half the term is remaining when she was elected to fill it Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LSCHelper Posted January 12, 2017 at 09:03 PM Author Report Share Posted January 12, 2017 at 09:03 PM Thanks, your response answered my concern. Our By-Laws do limit a BOD member to two (2) consecutive terms. Jerry Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts