paulmcclintock Posted May 20, 2010 at 10:32 PM Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 at 10:32 PM A page-244 continuing breach took place before Pat became a member. Can Pat raise a point of order now for this breach? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Harrison Posted May 20, 2010 at 10:34 PM Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 at 10:34 PM Yes. Members can make Point of Orders. I have no idea why she would do so, but maybe she knows something the others don't. Or she wants to make a big splash. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trina Posted May 20, 2010 at 10:39 PM Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 at 10:39 PM I'll say yes, although I have the feeling I'm falling for a trick question. Pat is a member, and has all the rights and obligations of membership. Pointing out a continuing breach seems like a responsibility of membership.Conversely, Pat's neighbor George, who used to be a member of the same organization back when the violation took place, is also deeply offended by the continuing breach. Nobody here will argue that George (now a non-member) can raise a point of order, will they? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmtcastle Posted May 20, 2010 at 10:43 PM Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 at 10:43 PM A page-244 continuing breach took place before Pat became a member. Can Pat raise a point of order now for this breach?Like Trina, I can't help but be suspicious when someone such as Mr. McClintock asks a question with a seemingly obvious answer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
paulmcclintock Posted May 20, 2010 at 10:46 PM Author Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 at 10:46 PM I'll say yes, although I have the feeling I'm falling for a trick question.Not intended as a trick question. I view this the same way, but don't see it explicitly handled in RONR, so wanted to ensure I wasn't missing something. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
hmtcastle Posted May 20, 2010 at 10:50 PM Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 at 10:50 PM but don't see it explicitly handled in RONRThere are an infinite number of things that are not explicitly handled in RONR. In those instances it's best to look for a rule that says you can't instead of a rule that says you can. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Harrison Posted May 20, 2010 at 10:53 PM Report Share Posted May 20, 2010 at 10:53 PM There are an infinite number of things that are not explicitly handled in RONR. In those instances it's best to look for a rule that says you can't instead of a rule that says you can.When a member thinks that the rules of the assembly are being violated, he can make a Point of Order (or "raise a question of order," as it is sometimes expressed), thereby calling upon the chair for a ruling and an enforcement of the regular rules. RONR p. 240I think that is probably as on point as you are going to find. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted May 21, 2010 at 12:45 AM Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 at 12:45 AM I frankly don't see any distinction if the member was present when the breach occurred, if the member was a member if the breach occurred, or if the was a member, left, and rejoined. If the person is a member at the time he raises the point of order, and the breach has not healed, the member may raise a point of order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Elsman Posted May 21, 2010 at 12:48 AM Report Share Posted May 21, 2010 at 12:48 AM While the breach of the assembly's rule continues, any member can raise a Point of Order about the violation for a ruling and enforcement. See RONR (10th ed.), p. 240, ll. 3-7. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.