Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'voting rights'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • RONR Message Board – Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised
    • General Discussion
    • Advanced Discussion
    • The Robert’s Rules Website
  • About the Message Board
    • Questions or Comments about the Message Board

Calendars

  • Community Calendar

Categories

There are no results to display.


Found 12 results

  1. We did not fill the position of Treasurer at a recent meeting; the previous person is continuing but only wants the position to be "Acting" not permanent. Does he still have full voting rights?
  2. Our non profit has a small limited set of bylaws. In it they state the Treasurer is "appointed" apparently by the chair/president. No where does it indicate that he can or cannot vote. Every board I have sat on, the Treasurer is part of the executive committee and full board and can vote. I cannot locate an answer in the RROO documents I've pulled up. Can someone assist with this question? I just joined this board and realize we need to change our bylaws but we're in a quandary at the moment and things are out of hand. Thanks to anyone who can help. Email is vnorthrup@cfl.rr.com.
  3. We have an on-going hostile takeover attempt at a local political club and the new comers are winning with incoming, new, majority members to create a majority voting bloc. In this process, some of the old guard are being accused of multiple bad deeds and put on formal trial to remove them from the Board, the majority rules, huh? The question is the trial voting process to find the accused guilty or not guilty and removal from the Executive Board and by Executive Board members, to which the accused is a normal voting member. Does the accused have the right to stay and vote, and/or leave a ballot to vote? Local club By-Laws do not address this part at all and several RR interested parties say yes and the hostile takeover guys say no, that the accused must leave the room and may not hear/vote by any definition. So, which is accurate? Below is wording in newly formed By-Laws by new majority voting members: Please advise ASAP, if at all possible, Thank you... Signed, Like it better the way we had been doing this for the past 40/years, phooney with this non-sense; but, Roberts does Rule. Note: this is to be followed by asking questions concerning the below described process of notification to accused, are you up fo this? ----------------------- An elected officer of the ARC may be removed for cause by 2/3 vote of the Executive Board at a special Executive Board meeting to remove that member. Two members of the Executive Board may bring a complaint against an officer and a meeting shall then be held and a vote taken on removal no later than 14 days after notifying the officer by mail and email. The officer in question has the right to respond to the allegations at this meeting. If the Executive Board has voted to remove the officer at this meeting, the officer may take the Executive Board decision to the general membership at the next general meeting for an up or down simple majority vote on the decision. The vote shall be based on the grounds for removal and the Executive Board decision.
  4. In my organization we have in our statutes that ex-officio members cannot vote. Robert's Rules grants ex-officio members all the same rights as normal members unless otherwise stated. There has been a debate that because we have in our statutes "ex-officio members cannot vote" that also means they are unable to make motions. I disagree because there is nothing in our statutes stating specifically that ex-officio members cannot make motion. Meanwhile others state that because making a motion leads to a vote it, in itself, is essentially the same as voting. So my question; can an ex-officio member motion and is making a motion the same as voting?
  5. The by-laws of our NFP organization state that the executive committee of the board of trustees shall consist of the president, vice president, secretary, treasurer, and one other trustee who volunteers to serve and is approved by the board. At this last month's executive board meeting, a guest remarked that this 5th person (the volunteer trustee) is not allowed to vote. A discussion ensued about this issue after addressing this section of the by-laws. Does it have to be spelled out that the volunteer (BoT member) has voting rights? I maintain that if the volunteer is approved by the board to be on the Executive Committee then they are automatically given the right to a vote.
  6. During a recent meeting a person who was ineligible to vote voted during a voice vote. The result was 15-15 with one abstention. After the meeting closed a voting member brought forth the information that the there was an ineligible voter. Currently there is discussion as to whether the vote entirely should be invalidated or just eliminate the vote of the ineligible party (for clarity the ineligible was a nay) and does the abstention count towards the yays or nays?
  7. Executive Director

    Good morning all, Here is my question. Can an Executive Director on a NFP have voting rights?
  8. Does a Member at Large have the same voting rights as any other member of the Board of Directors?
  9. If our Board members are unable to attend a regularly scheduled full Board meeting, we allow them to attend the Executive Committee meeting to receive credit. Should those members be allowed to vote during Executive Committee meetings? Should their presence be considered in determining quorum?
  10. I am the Chairperson for an college organization. In the Executive Board meetings, which are held weekly, there are the following present: President* Vice-President* Secretary* Treasurer* Chairman (myself) Academic Advisor The four main officers (*) were elected by the general membership. I volunteered myself as Chairperson, but the officers took a vote and unanimously voted me in as Chair. Our academic advisor, however, was voted in. He merely started to attend the meetings for the sake of his role as advisor for the organization. According to the college's description of the advisor, it states, "Advisors should work with student groups, but should not direct nor dictate the organization’s programs and activities. However, advisors should be frank in offering suggestions, considerations, or ideas for the group’s discussion." So my question is, does the advisor have any rights during the E.B. meetings? (primarily making motions and voting) And do I, the Chair, have such rights as well? Thank-you in advance for your help!
  11. Does an interim Sec and Treas have the same voting rights as a Sec and Treas on the board?
  12. I serve as parliamentarian for a small board. RONR p. 451. appears to preclude "a member of the assembly who acts as its parliamentarian" from casting a vote except in the case of a ballot vote. My question is this: If I am asked to rule on a particular motion from a parliamentary position, must I abstain from voting on the motion? Do I have to abstain from voting on ALL motions before the Board? What are the rules for having a Board member serve as parliamentarian? Does it matter that we operate under small board rules? Thanks for any help!
×