J. J. Posted September 29, 2017 at 05:56 PM Report Share Posted September 29, 2017 at 05:56 PM 3 hours ago, Joshua Katz said: Which rights, and of whom? I do not think that any absentees or people who become members at some point in the future have a "right" to read the tellers' report in the minutes. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nancy N. Posted September 30, 2017 at 12:08 AM Report Share Posted September 30, 2017 at 12:08 AM 9 hours ago, Joshua Katz said: Which rights, and of whom? Still thinking about it. But please mind that these questions are beside the point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nancy N. Posted September 30, 2017 at 12:12 AM Report Share Posted September 30, 2017 at 12:12 AM 6 hours ago, J. J. said: I do not think that any absentees or people who become members at some point in the future have a "right" to read the tellers' report in the minutes. What about current members? (If no one's rights are violated, then why is including the tellers' report in the minutes an important, intrinsic part of the balloting process? ) Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted September 30, 2017 at 01:31 AM Report Share Posted September 30, 2017 at 01:31 AM 1 hour ago, Guest Nancy N. said: What about current members? (If no one's rights are violated, then why is including the tellers' report in the minutes an important, intrinsic part of the balloting process? ) First, I am not sure that anyone feels that putting the tellers report in the minutes is "an important, intrinsic part of the balloting process." I certainly do not. The current members could have gone to the election meeting or request to see the tellers' report. Any member has the right to see the records (p. 460, ll. 12-7). No one is suggesting that the tellers' report be shredded. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts