Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Nominations & Elections


Amber

Recommended Posts

Our organization accepts nominations before our conference and also from the floor during the conference business meeting. Members then vote by ballot later that evening. My questions are:

When a nomination is made from the floor, does it require a second?

If there is only one nominee for an office and they are elected by acclimation,  does this need a second or is it appropriate to simply say "If there are no further objections, I declare the nominee elected by acclimation?

Do nominations from the floor require a motion to close the vote? Is it appropriate to say "There being no further nominations, I declare nomination closed for the office of Secretary?

Does any of this change just because we have a Nominations & Elections committee?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

In the order that you asked:

1. Nominations do not require a second.

2. If there is only one nominee, the chair can declare the nominee elected unless your bylaws require a ballot vote. If so you must still vote by ballot. That requirement cannot be waived.

3. A motion to close nominations is not necessary. After an appropriate pause, if it appears there are no more nominations, the chair may declare the nominations closed using the language you indicated.

4. Having a nominating committee does not cause that procedure to change, except the report of the nominating committee is received first. The chair then asks if there are any additional nominations for each office.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Richard Brown said:

3. A motion to close nominations is not necessary. After an appropriate pause, if it appears there are no more nominations, the chair may declare the nominations closed using the language you indicated.

Well, not exactly the same language.  More like: "If there are no further objections nominations....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

And try this as well:

"The practice in some organizations of permitting the chairman of a committee to preside over the assembly or put questions to vote during the presentation and consideration of the committee's report violates numerous principles of parliamentary law relating to the chair's appearance of impartiality and the inappropriateness of his entering into debate, not to speak of the regular presiding officer's duty to preside (see pp. 448–49)."   (RONR, 11th ed., p. 453) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...