Hi,
I'm part of a student government, and recently the chair proposed a rules change after some issues with disruptive behaviour (talking over others, rudeness, etc.) during meetings. The rule is essentially a two-strikes policy, whereby anyone breaking the chair's definition of decorum is removed from the assembly for the session and cannot vote. The issue is that this rule was put in place with no input from the assembly, and I can't find anything in our SG constitution, or Robert's Rules to back it up. If it was passed as an amendment to the constitution, it would be fine, but I'm a bit worried about the current implementation. Is this established procedure in anyway?
Thanks!