Thanks, Josh. In applying RONR, should we view a term as 2 years, as defined in the bylaws; or 4 years which is the period for which they are elected. This is nuanced because of the staggered nature of the roles.
If we base it on 2 years, it would be viewed as 1 term served. If elected for the position, they would be eligible to serve another 2 years. This would disrupt the staggering of positions.
If we base it on 4 years, the officer would not have completed half of a 4 year term, and would be eligible to run for the usual 4 years (2 consecutive terms). This would maintain the staggering of positions. This approach seems more consistent with RONR and the intentions of the bylaws. I'd appreciate your view.