Some quick background: I am a member of a local association that meets once a month. Our bylaws currently state that elections be held in January with only dues paid members voting in person to elect our officers. The term of said election is one year. Officers have a two term limit. Due to COVID restrictions here, we were forced to stop meeting last June 2020, and only resumed virtually last month (Feb).
During our last meeting, a motion was made to allow the elected officers to stay on in 2021 as if it was part of 2020, so no penalty would be incurred as far as term limit eligibility would be concerned. The general idea behind it was it was unfair to the current officers as they did not serve a full term, and as we are meeting digitally via zoom, an election in person would most likely not happen until June or July, thus being unfair to whomever was elected this year (if different from our current officers).
An amendment was proposed to allow the officers to stay, but have it count towards the two year limit, effectively preventing them from running next year (They were all elected to their first term in 2020). This was voted on and failed, leaving the motion in place to keep officers for the year, and allow them to run next year. The motion passed overwhelmingly, with only a few votes against.
My questions are, would this count as a change to the bylaws, or not? If so, as bylaws cannot be suspended, could such a motion even be allowed? Assuming the ruling is this should not have been allowed, how could such a thing be accomplished?
Thanks in advance for your responses!