Update: General Counsel for the Association has returned with a written opinion on the matter. Our bylaws are completely silent on disciplinary matters, and all we have to use for a framework is RONR. The process, thus far, hasn't even followed the steps outlined in the book, unfortunately. There has been no trial proceedings, no committee formed, no formal investigation.....the meetings barely follow Parliamentary Procedures.
Two individuals made a complaint to the property management company. The Board was made aware of the two complaints, and the accused prepared a defense, of sorts. During Executive Session the Board voted to seek legal advice - which we did. At the next monthly meeting, during Executive Session, we are anticipating a vote on the matter at hand. However, we are unclear on who should withhold their vote. It seems obvious that the accused would not vote, but one of the complaints was made by a fellow Board member. This situation does not, clearly, fall within the one circumstance under which a member should withhold their vote yet it seems ludicrous that a Board member can bring a charge, even loosely, then vote on it! I fear we are about to set a precedent for future dealings and we need to do things correctly. Any guidance here?