I would point out that the House and Senate do not use Robert's Rules. And motions to censure the Adams, Jackson and Clinton among other Presidents have been introduced. I still see nothing that would prevent censure, especially of a superior board to a sub group. But, since there is nothing specific, the ultimate answer will lie with the membership. If someone believes the motion is not proper they can ask for a vote. And then if they are correct, they could ask for a censure vote on those who voted to censure setting up an endless loop. Why I prefer the much more effective motion of "big fat meanie." Much simpler and produces same effect. As a side note and out of RONR scope, if you want some background on censure in the house - The Democrates produced a report with lots of footnotes on censure history and application on house members (and former members). http://democrats.rules.house.gov/archives/rl31382.pdf