Gentlemen (Merritt & Lages),
Thank you for your quick, thoughtful, and informative replies. I have chaired boards and governance committees, yet have never encountered a board that is so lax in its governance processes, yet uses the threat of fines, sanctions, and liens on properties, all available in the bylaws, to "police" the HOA members. This is my first HOA and maybe this casual or uniformed approach is the norm, but it seems risky for the board to not pay attention to their own and Roberts rules (the bylaws expressly state Roberts governing).
I was shocked to receive the revised date and so close to the original that my gut told me the original Sep 20 meeting should have been held, called to order, attendance taken, and if a quorum wasn't present then adjourn after setting the new time, even if that falls outside of September. The bylaws have procedures for lacking a quorum. To not have held the meeting and notified of the new date only 6 days before that original date felt like a breach of Roberts and the bylaws. Furthermore, it is unclear to me if the meeting called for on new date, Oct 5 was probably not properly authorized by a board vote, and thus may make it or anything voted on during it, invalid.
My limited or new experience with this board and certainly the annual meeting is treated more like a party with invitations and RSVP's than a requirement of the governance of the HOA.
Thank you again for your informative responses,
Robert