Search the Community
Showing results for tags 'notice of motion'.
Found 2 results
if a motion is to change bylaws and refers to 'the law' as a reason for change, then at the meeting 'the law' is finally given (read but no hard copy), but this is inadequate notice given no chance of prior review of the purported requirement (and ultimately members were fooled into voting a change not in fact required by law) - is there a basis for challenge in Robert's Rules of Order after the fact? I understand that there is a legal basis (mistake, misrepresentation etc) but wanted to know if Robert's has some basis to invalidate something like that based on notice rules or any other procedure.