Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'suspension of the rules'.



More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


Forums

  • RONR Message Board – Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised
    • General Discussion
    • Advanced Discussion
    • The Robert’s Rules Website
  • About the Message Board
    • Questions or Comments about the Message Board
  • Archive
    • Archived Discussions (2010)

Find results in...

Find results that contain...


Date Created

  • Start

    End


Last Updated

  • Start

    End


Filter by number of...

Joined

  • Start

    End


Group


Location:


Interests

Found 1 result

  1. When business is about to be conducted in a manner inconsistent with the rules, may an aware chair choose to say nothing, and construe the failure of a point of order to be raised as the equivalent of general consent or, if not, indicate that while the business is inconsistent with "the rules", if there is no objection, s/he will allow it or, if not, provided the chair does identify, to the assembly, the rule that interferes with the proposed handling (or consideration, at all) of the business, may the chair then propose that if there is no objection, s/he will allow it? or, even without asking for or hearing objection, is the chair required to actually establish to call for the votes in favor of and against the suspension?
×
×
  • Create New...