Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Search the Community

Showing results for tags 'what are tags'.

More search options

  • Search By Tags

    Type tags separated by commas.
  • Search By Author

Content Type


  • RONR Message Board – Robert’s Rules of Order Newly Revised
    • General Discussion
    • Advanced Discussion
    • The Robert’s Rules Website
  • About the Message Board
    • Questions or Comments about the Message Board


There are no results to display.

Find results in...

Find results that contain...

Date Created

  • Start


Last Updated

  • Start


Filter by number of...


  • Start





Found 2 results

  1. We got an opinion from a Parliamentarian that our club election was “null and void” because the first ballot had an error so had to be reprinted, but the voters had the required 30 days with which to vote. He provided no authority and his conclusions were that the incumbents would stay in their positions and even directors running in contested positions could vote on the election issues. Don’t Parliamentarians have an obligation to support their “opinions” with the authority in RONR on which they rely. This Parliamentarian is an attorney and failed to provide notice in his opinion that State Las prohibits directors with conflicts of interest from voting. Thanks for your response. Colleen Allen Grady
  2. Guest


    My organization voted to donate $200 to a charity. One person was unhappy (the President) and she said she would personally fund an additional $100 to bring donation to $300. Subsequently she went to Treasurer and had her cut an additional check for $100 (her priviledge to have a check up to $100 not needing a vote by members) from organization funds therefore undermining the original vote by members. Is there any recourse for recovering those extra funds distributed? Besides being unethical, what is Roberts Rules on this type of situation.
  • Create New...