Guest Gayle Posted March 16, 2011 at 11:21 AM Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 at 11:21 AM We have a new secretary of a committee that I am on. Always before attendees names have been posted near the beginning of the published and approved minutes. The have now been taken off and put on a separate document. My understanding is that attendance needs to be on the main document. Is this correct or is it really a matter of preference? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstackpo Posted March 16, 2011 at 12:30 PM Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 at 12:30 PM I fear your understanding has been misguided (unless your association has special rules - ask you informant to show them to you - if they exist). "That is how we have always done it" doesn't count.RONR doesn't require attendance at all at meetings, let alone documenting who is, or is not, at a meeting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted March 16, 2011 at 12:34 PM Report Share Posted March 16, 2011 at 12:34 PM We have a new secretary of a committee that I am on. Always before attendees names have been posted near the beginning of the published and approved minutes. The have now been taken off and put on a separate document. My understanding is that attendance needs to be on the main document. Is this correct or is it really a matter of preference?I don't think there's any support for the minutes including a "separate document" attached for any reason. I've never heard of this myself, although that doesn't mean it has no historical precedence. The organizations I am familiar with that do have a roll call at the meetings include that information right after noting that the meeting was called to order at ______ date/time, etc. As noted, RONR does not require this, so it's your own rules that need to be followed in this regard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.