Guest Roland Posted August 31, 2011 at 05:56 PM Report Share Posted August 31, 2011 at 05:56 PM When is the proper time to bring up at an meeting that that meeting should be null and void because of improper notice of meeting?Before the president calls the meeting to order? After? Before the reading of the previous meeting? Before Old Business,,,,,ect?ThanksRoland Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted August 31, 2011 at 06:02 PM Report Share Posted August 31, 2011 at 06:02 PM When is the proper time to bring up at an meeting that that meeting should be null and void because of improper notice of meeting?Before the president calls the meeting to order? After? Before the reading of the previous meeting? Before Old Business,,,,,ect?ThanksRolandASAP Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted September 1, 2011 at 03:20 AM Report Share Posted September 1, 2011 at 03:20 AM When is the proper time to bring up at an meeting that that meeting should be null and void because of improper notice of meeting?Before the president calls the meeting to order? After? Before the reading of the previous meeting? Before Old Business,,,,,ect?I would bring it up as soon as possible. Try discussing it with the President prior to the meeting first (and if you have days or weeks before the meeting, give him a call - don't wait till the last minute). If the President is unwilling to listen and it looks like you'll need to use a Point of Order and Appeal, the earliest you could raise it would be immediately after the meeting is called to order, and that's when I would recommend raising it. Waiting longer just means wasting more of the assembly's time and, most likely, making the Appeal much more difficult. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Wynn Posted September 2, 2011 at 06:52 PM Report Share Posted September 2, 2011 at 06:52 PM When is the proper time to bring up at an meeting that that meeting should be null and void because of improper notice of meeting?Before the president calls the meeting to order? After? Before the reading of the previous meeting? Before Old Business,,,,,ect?ThanksRolandI'm generally of the opinion that the proceedings of an improper meeting are not governed by parliamentary law. However, there's probably no harm in gathered persons collectively deciding that they are not in a legal meeting, are not an assembly, and therefore have no authority to decide what they just decided. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.