Guest Paulette Posted September 28, 2011 at 07:15 PM Report Share Posted September 28, 2011 at 07:15 PM We had a motion come up for vote and it was a tie because one member was out.We held another meeting with all members present. The motion was moved on and seconded then discussion ensued. Many ideas were put forth. The president called a vote even though discussion was not done. The motion did not pass. A member started to say she wished to amend the motion and the president interrupted and said I move to adjourn. Nobody seconded it or voted on it. The members. who wanted the motion to carry, including the superintendent got up and left. The members that voted no wanted to continue discussing to come up with a solution.First off, was the member who wanted to amend the motion after the vote in the right...could she do that?Second, was this meeting really adjourned? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
tctheatc Posted September 28, 2011 at 07:20 PM Report Share Posted September 28, 2011 at 07:20 PM If the motion failed, it failed. It is not then before the assembly for amendment/perfection/tweaking or even discussion. So I would say no, she cannot. However, the failed motion can be reintroduced at the next (or another) meeting if you like. If everyone left, the meeting's over. A point of order on the chair's motion would have had to be raised in a timely fashion. After everyone's gone, I would think, would be too late. JMHO. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Elsman Posted September 29, 2011 at 12:52 AM Report Share Posted September 29, 2011 at 12:52 AM We had a motion come up for vote and it was a tie because one member was out.We held another meeting with all members present. The motion was moved on and seconded then discussion ensued. Many ideas were put forth. The president called a vote even though discussion was not done. The motion did not pass. A member started to say she wished to amend the motion and the president interrupted and said I move to adjourn. Nobody seconded it or voted on it. The members. who wanted the motion to carry, including the superintendent got up and left. The members that voted no wanted to continue discussing to come up with a solution.First off, was the member who wanted to amend the motion after the vote in the right...could she do that?Second, was this meeting really adjourned?Almost none of the procedures used have anything to do with proper parliamentary procedure. All of you might want to get copies of the new edition of RONR and read them front to back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tim Wynn Posted September 29, 2011 at 01:14 AM Report Share Posted September 29, 2011 at 01:14 AM Almost none of the procedures used have anything to do with proper parliamentary procedure. All of you might want to get copies of the new edition of RONR and read them front to back.Second. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted September 29, 2011 at 04:39 AM Report Share Posted September 29, 2011 at 04:39 AM Almost none of the procedures used have anything to do with proper parliamentary procedure. All of you might want to get copies of the new edition of RONR and read them front to back.Second.Or perhaps the new edition of Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised In Brief for starters. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.