David A Foulkes Posted October 25, 2011 at 11:29 AM Report Share Posted October 25, 2011 at 11:29 AM ... the sentence on p. 637, ll. 32-35 from the 10th?thx Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted October 25, 2011 at 11:49 AM Report Share Posted October 25, 2011 at 11:49 AM ... the sentence on p. 637, ll. 32-35 from the 10th?thxIt may be included in the resolutions preferring charges (see p. 659, ll. 6-7, and the sample resolutions which follow). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted October 25, 2011 at 12:11 PM Author Report Share Posted October 25, 2011 at 12:11 PM Okay, thanks. So, whereas the 10th seemed to suggest that upon notification of the trial, the accused member's rights were suspended automatically, it now seems as that suspension of rights must be recommended by the investigating committee as part of their resolution, and is in fact optional. Is that a fairly correct understanding of this point? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted October 25, 2011 at 01:13 PM Report Share Posted October 25, 2011 at 01:13 PM Okay, thanks. So, whereas the 10th seemed to suggest that upon notification of the trial, the accused member's rights were suspended automatically, it now seems as that suspension of rights must be recommended by the investigating committee as part of their resolution, and is in fact optional. Is that a fairly correct understanding of this point?Well, I don't know why you characterize what is said in the 10th ed. as being a suggestion (although this hardly matters anymore), and I don't think that it is correct to say that, in the current edition, "suspension of rights must be recommended by the investigating committee", since the assembly may include a resolution suspending rights whether or not the committee recommends it, but other than that I suppose it is fairly correct.By the way, I should also have referred you to the third paragraph on page 662 in my initial response, and I apologize for the omission. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted October 25, 2011 at 01:28 PM Author Report Share Posted October 25, 2011 at 01:28 PM Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.