Guest Conrad Lattes Posted November 18, 2011 at 11:51 PM Report Share Posted November 18, 2011 at 11:51 PM If the bylaws of an organization state that it will follow Robert's Rules of Order, but it does not. If no objection to the failure to follow the Rules is raised during the meeting, what is the effect of an objection raised after the meeting has concluded? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Edgar Posted November 18, 2011 at 11:58 PM Report Share Posted November 18, 2011 at 11:58 PM If the bylaws of an organization state that it will follow Robert's Rules of Order, but it does not. If no objection to the failure to follow the Rules is raised during the meeting, what is the effect of an objection raised after the meeting has concluded?It depends on which rule wasn't followed. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Harrison Posted November 19, 2011 at 12:08 AM Report Share Posted November 19, 2011 at 12:08 AM If the bylaws of an organization state that it will follow Robert's Rules of Order, but it does not. If no objection to the failure to follow the Rules is raised during the meeting, what is the effect of an objection raised after the meeting has concluded?With five exceptions on RONR p. 251 a Point of Order must be timely and if it isn't the YSYL principle applies. However, if one of those exceptions apply a Point of Order need not be timely. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SchoolBoardSec Posted November 19, 2011 at 02:34 PM Report Share Posted November 19, 2011 at 02:34 PM With five exceptions on RONR p. 251 a Point of Order must be timely and if it isn't the YSYL principle applies. However, if one of those exceptions apply a Point of Order need not be timely.But surely, the SOL rule does not apply ! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstackpo Posted November 19, 2011 at 02:40 PM Report Share Posted November 19, 2011 at 02:40 PM Please fill in "SOL" for us unsophisticates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Edgar Posted November 19, 2011 at 02:43 PM Report Share Posted November 19, 2011 at 02:43 PM Please fill in "SOL" for us unsophisticatesThat's what Google is for. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Trina Posted November 19, 2011 at 02:48 PM Report Share Posted November 19, 2011 at 02:48 PM Please fill in "SOL" for us unsophisticateshttp://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=S.O.L.And, to SchoolBoardSec, yes, the SOL rule does often apply in parliamentary procedure -- most errors must be addressed in a timely way Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted November 19, 2011 at 03:00 PM Report Share Posted November 19, 2011 at 03:00 PM If the bylaws of an organization state that it will follow Robert's Rules of Order, but it does not. If no objection to the failure to follow the Rules is raised during the meeting, what is the effect of an objection raised after the meeting has concluded?And just to clarify one last item, since we've often read here about such things, you can't raise an objection (Point of Order) after the meeting has concluded. You'd need to wait until the next meeting to raise it. Mr. Lattes doesn't specify how he's using the word "after" here, but it sounded to me as if it meant after the meeting had adjourned, in that period between meetings when such thoughts often arise. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.