Guest Jim Posted March 11, 2013 at 07:15 PM Report Share Posted March 11, 2013 at 07:15 PM Is there a penatly for a member telling the public of discussions concerning personnel during executive session? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted March 11, 2013 at 07:19 PM Report Share Posted March 11, 2013 at 07:19 PM Is there a penatly for a member telling the public of discussions concerning personnel during executive session?"A member of a society can be punished under disciplinary procedure if he violates the secrecy of an executive session." RONR (11th ed.), p. 96, ll. 6-7 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary c Tesser Posted March 12, 2013 at 10:09 AM Report Share Posted March 12, 2013 at 10:09 AM I wonder why it doesn't say "should." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted March 12, 2013 at 10:20 AM Report Share Posted March 12, 2013 at 10:20 AM I wonder why it doesn't say "should."Because maybe he shouldn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted March 12, 2013 at 01:31 PM Report Share Posted March 12, 2013 at 01:31 PM I wonder why it doesn't say "should."Because maybe he shouldn't.I knew they had a shoot first/ask questions later attitude up on Flatbush Avenue, but my goodness, Gary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted March 13, 2013 at 02:37 AM Report Share Posted March 13, 2013 at 02:37 AM I wonder why it doesn't say "should."Determining how a society should proceed in any particular disciplinary case will require a careful review of the specifics of the situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.