Watson Posted March 26, 2013 at 04:21 PM Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 at 04:21 PM The bylaws read: "The presiding officer shall . . . conduct the proceedings of the meeting in accordance with the parliamentary rules contained in Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised, unless otherwise provided by statute or by the rules in this chapter." Recently, after researching a topic, I quoted RONR (11th ed.). Immediately another member stated that this was incorrect and that I must reference the 10th Edition because that was the edition in use when the bylaws were written and approved. Not wishing to be confrontational, is there an Official Interpretation to which I may refer in response? Thank you, RTW Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted March 26, 2013 at 04:44 PM Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 at 04:44 PM "This Eleventh Edition supersedes all previous editions and is intended automatically to become the parliamentary authority in organizations whose bylaws prescribe "Robert's Rules of Order," "Robert's Rules of Order Revised," "Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised," or "the current edition of" any of these titles, or the like, without specifying a particular edition. If the bylaws specifically identify one of the ten previous editions of the work as parliamentary authority, the bylaws should be amended to prescribe "the current edition of ‘Robert's Rules of Order Newly Revised'" (see p. 588)." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted March 26, 2013 at 04:45 PM Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 at 04:45 PM The bylaws read: "The presiding officer shall . . . conduct the proceedings of the meeting in accordance with the parliamentary rules contained in Robert's Rules of Order, Newly Revised, unless otherwise provided by statute or by the rules in this chapter." Recently, after researching a topic, I quoted RONR (11th ed.). Immediately another member stated that this was incorrect and that I must reference the 10th Edition because that was the edition in use when the bylaws were written and approved. Not wishing to be confrontational, is there an Official Interpretation to which I may refer in response?This is actually addressed in the book. See RONR, 11th ed., pg. vii. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstackpo Posted March 26, 2013 at 04:48 PM Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 at 04:48 PM Well, there is a (slightly self-serving) note on p. vii (unnumbered) that likes to claim that it, the 11th Ed., "supersedes all previous editions". Except for the self-referential logic problems, ("I'm official because I say I am.") this is probably as good as you are going to get. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted March 26, 2013 at 04:55 PM Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 at 04:55 PM Well, there is a (slightly self-serving) note on p. vii (unnumbered) that likes to claim that it, the 11th Ed., "supersedes all previous editions".Except for the self-referential logic problems, ("I'm official because I say I am.") this is probably as good as you are going to get.The 10th edition has the exact same note, however (referring to the 10th as superseding previous editions), so that may lend validity to the 11th edition's note in this case. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted March 26, 2013 at 05:02 PM Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 at 05:02 PM Well, there is a (slightly self-serving) note on p. vii (unnumbered) that likes to claim that it, the 11th Ed., "supersedes all previous editions".Except for the self-referential logic problems, ("I'm official because I say I am.") this is probably as good as you are going to get.It seems more helpful than self-serving, John. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Edgar Posted March 26, 2013 at 10:42 PM Report Share Posted March 26, 2013 at 10:42 PM The 10th edition has the exact same note, however (referring to the 10th as superseding previous editions), so that may lend validity to the 11th edition's note in this case.And, before that, it's turtles all the way down. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.