DanishM15 Posted April 23, 2013 at 04:09 AM Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 at 04:09 AM Two items: 1) Is there such a thing as a "formal poll" (using electronic voting so everyone's vote is recorded) according to Robert's Rules? What does Robert's Rules have to say about "polls" and if anything at all about "formal polls"? I am aware that Robert's Rules prohibits straw polls, which happen to be informal polls...but what is the ruling in the case of formal polls? 2) If we are dealing with a motion that requires 2/3 majority to pass; is it possible to move to suspend the rules in order to change from 2/3 majority to a simple majority (51%)? If that can be done, would that not strip the minority of its rights? And thus a move to suspending the rules would not be possible? If anyone can help me with these questions I would greatly appreciate it (and if you can provide citations)! Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstackpo Posted April 23, 2013 at 08:44 AM Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 at 08:44 AM On "formal polls": No, RONR, doesn't define them. On reducing an adoption threshold from, say, 2/3 to majority: See the (somewhat syntactically challenging) rule #7 on p. 261. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted April 23, 2013 at 02:04 PM Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 at 02:04 PM Two items: 1) Is there such a thing as a "formal poll" (using electronic voting so everyone's vote is recorded) according to Robert's Rules? What does Robert's Rules have to say about "polls" and if anything at all about "formal polls"? I am aware that Robert's Rules prohibits straw polls, which happen to be informal polls...but what is the ruling in the case of formal polls? 2) If we are dealing with a motion that requires 2/3 majority to pass; is it possible to move to suspend the rules in order to change from 2/3 majority to a simple majority (51%)? If that can be done, would that not strip the minority of its rights? And thus a move to suspending the rules would not be possible? If anyone can help me with these questions I would greatly appreciate it (and if you can provide citations)! Thank you."Formal polls" would be termed "votes". If it's anything less than that, it's straw, and prohibited. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sMargaret Posted April 23, 2013 at 02:44 PM Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 at 02:44 PM a simple majority (51%)Note - a simple majority is greater than 50%, not 51%. This can matter a great deal, depending on the size of your membership. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted April 23, 2013 at 03:18 PM Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 at 03:18 PM 1) Is there such a thing as a "formal poll" (using electronic voting so everyone's vote is recorded) according to Robert's Rules?No.What does Robert's Rules have to say about "polls" and if anything at all about "formal polls"? I am aware that Robert's Rules prohibits straw polls, which happen to be informal polls...but what is the ruling in the case of formal polls?Straw polls during a meeting are prohibited. That's the extent of what RONR says about polls. RONR says nothing about "formal" polls and I don't believe RONR would recognize such a distinction. So far as RONR is concerned, it's either a vote or it's not - and if it's not, it's a straw poll.Voting with electronic voting devices in a meeting is permitted, although some special rules may be advisable. Absentee voting by electronic methods (or any method) is prohibited unless authorized by the Bylaws or mandated by applicable law.If you want to have a straw poll outside of a meeting, RONR won't stop you, but it also doesn't have any advice on how to handle such a poll.2) If we are dealing with a motion that requires 2/3 majority to pass; is it possible to move to suspend the rules in order to change from 2/3 majority to a simple majority (51%)?Yes. Keep in mind, however, that a majority is "more than half," not "51%."If that can be done, would that not strip the minority of its rights? And thus a move to suspending the rules would not be possible? If anyone can help me with these questions I would greatly appreciate it (and if you can provide citations)!Yes, it would, but a motion to Suspend the Rules requires a 2/3 vote. So in order to adopt such a motion, the minority would need to let you strip its rights. RONR permits a motion to Suspend the Rules to strip a minority of its rights unless it's opposed by the minority the rule is intended to protect. Based on this principle, if you had, say, a rule which required a 3/4 vote to adopt a motion, you'd need a 3/4 vote to suspend that rule. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanishM15 Posted April 23, 2013 at 09:01 PM Author Report Share Posted April 23, 2013 at 09:01 PM Thank you all for your responses! Greatly appreciate it! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.