Guest Rita Posted April 18, 2014 at 05:09 PM Report Share Posted April 18, 2014 at 05:09 PM We have regular chapter business meetings and social meetings. The hour the meeting is to start is stated in our standing rules. Is a social meeting considered a chapter meeting? I am trying to determine if we have to vote to change the time of a social meeting or not. Our standing rules states that a Chapter vote must be taken at a previous meeting to change the time. Thank you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstackpo Posted April 18, 2014 at 05:23 PM Report Share Posted April 18, 2014 at 05:23 PM Your "social meeting" only becomes a "business meeting" if you intend to transact, well, business at it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edgar Guest Posted April 18, 2014 at 08:22 PM Report Share Posted April 18, 2014 at 08:22 PM Your "social meeting" only becomes a "business meeting" if you intend to transact, well, business at it. I don't think we have enough information to determine what, in Guest Rita's organization, is the difference between a "business meeting" and a "social meeting" (or how, or whether, you can turn one into the other). In RONR-Land there are only meetings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Nancy N. Posted April 19, 2014 at 07:01 AM Report Share Posted April 19, 2014 at 07:01 AM I don't think we have enough information to determine what, in Guest Rita's organization, is the difference between a "business meeting" and a "social meeting" (or how, or whether, you can turn one into the other). In RONR-Land there are only meetings. But those are specifically, and intrinsically, business meetings. Can't we say that if the social meetings do not include any business (by rule, non-suspendable), they are clearly not governed by parliamentary procedure. But Guest_Rita, if the organization does not decide when to schedule, or to re-schedule, its social meetings, who will? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted April 19, 2014 at 05:54 PM Report Share Posted April 19, 2014 at 05:54 PM But those are specifically, and intrinsically, business meetings. Can't we say that if the social meetings do not include any business (by rule, non-suspendable), they are clearly not governed by parliamentary procedure. Yes, I think we can say that if the meetings cannot conduct business, then they are not meetings of a deliberative assembly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.