Guest Alex Posted April 20, 2014 at 08:38 PM Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 at 08:38 PM Under Robert's Rules, is there such thing as a recusal in the case of a conflict of interest? If an individual in the voting assembly has a conflict of interest, would the individual be required to leave the room prior to discussion (or will he/she be allowed to participate in discussion so long as the conflict is announced)? If so, would the individual be removed from the quorum? If not, what would be the proper procedure to address a conflict of interest? Will the individual recuse or abstain? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted April 20, 2014 at 08:42 PM Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 at 08:42 PM See http://www.robertsrules.com/faq.html#9 He certainly cannot be forced to leave the room and he counts toward a quorum under the rules in RONR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Edgar Posted April 20, 2014 at 08:50 PM Report Share Posted April 20, 2014 at 08:50 PM And if the member remains in the room he counts towards the quorum, even if he chooses not to exercise his right to vote. And there's no "recusal" in RONR-Land (that usually something judges do). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.