Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

motion tabled


Guest mark

Recommended Posts

No, those are two different tables.

 

It's more than likely that the table belonging to the General Assembly of delegates is now empty. 

 

"In cases in which the lapse of time between regular business sessions is greater than a quarterly time interval (see pp. 89–90), a question laid on the table can remain there only until the end of the current session; and unless taken from the table earlier, the matter dies with the close of that session."  RONR (11th ed.), p. 214, but as noted, the answer is still "no", regardless.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

Is it a proper motion if there has been little or no discussion of the issue

 

The motion to Lay Upon the Table is rarely needed in ordinary societies, and therefore seldom in order.  So, odds are, it's not proper.  But that has nothing to do with whether there has been discussion or not.

 

Tabling is used only to put a question aside temporarily so that something urgent that has just come up can be dealt with, after which it is once again taken from the table exactly as it was.  If that's not the reason you're using it, it's not in order.  You probably want the motion to Postpone.

 

For more info see FAQ #12.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is it a proper motion if there has been little or no discussion of the issue

 

If the intent is to put aside the motion temporarily, then how much discussion has taken place doesn't matter. If the intent is to kill the motion, then a motion to postpone indefinately should be used instead. People have the option of debating this motion, as well as the main motion. If the intent is to end debate, then the motion for the previous question is the proper motion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...