Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

replacing rules


Rifleman1776

Recommended Posts

Previous notice of the changes to be moved are normally required by the bylaws.  In my experience it is a good practice to show the old and new language next to each other so members can quickly see exactly what the change is, but that's not strictly required.  Even so, most organizations probably do it that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Nothing in RONR would require this.

Correct, altough RONR does note that a side-by-side comarrison of the existing langauge and the proposoed new language may be helpful. But if the change is a complete revision, as it seems may be the case here, a side-by-side comparison often is not practical.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all. Not happy with responses but it is what it is. Will have a situation next week calling for a complete revision that will make the chairman essentially an autorized dictator. Most members are not familiar with the old rules and have not been provided a copy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thanks all. Not happy with responses but it is what it is. Will have a situation next week calling for a complete revision that will make the chairman essentially an autorized dictator. Most members are not familiar with the old rules and have not been provided a copy.

Well, you're free to provide them a copy if you think it will help.  You're also free to point out during debate that the proposed changes would make the chairman essentially an authorized dictator.  You're also free to make amendments to the proposals that would make him a less authorized dictator.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...