Guest Sonny Posted June 17, 2014 at 05:40 PM Report Share Posted June 17, 2014 at 05:40 PM The Vice-chair conducted a television interview and made some pretty outrageous remarks to the press while representing our board. The Chairman did not call a governing body meeting and took it upon self to address the issue by putting out a statement. Shouldn't the Chairman involve his governing body to address the issues? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted June 17, 2014 at 06:15 PM Report Share Posted June 17, 2014 at 06:15 PM The only duties prescribed in RONR for the chairman are those related to presiding over meetings. If your society has assigned other roles, such as serving as a public spokesman for the governing body, then those would have to be spelled out in your organization's bylaws or standing rules. Anyway--they're not in RONR. So, if a majority of the membership feels he overstepped his bounds by assuming authority for things not assigned to him, they can discipline him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Harrison Posted June 17, 2014 at 06:15 PM Report Share Posted June 17, 2014 at 06:15 PM He probably should have but nothing in RONR would require it. However, the Chair and Vice Chair could be subjected to discipline if they are making statements on behalf of the Board without permission (especially if the Board doesn't agree with said statements). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.