Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Executive meeting


Guest J Kichline

Recommended Posts

See FAQ #20.

 

Typically, the authority to remove someone from office rests with those who elected him in the first place (e.g. the general membership).

 

But what do you mean by "an executive meeting"? Do you mean a meeting of the executive board? the executive committee? Or a meeting held in executive (i.e. confidential) session?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I am referring to executive session (secret). Our by laws do give the board the authority to remove an officer or board member from office, but can it be done in executive session?

 

 

As far as RONR is concerned, yes.

 

As Mr. Fish, notes, yes, it can be done, but if you're conducting a trial then the meeting must be held in executive session.  RONR (11th ed.), p. 655.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our by laws also state in the same article that if it is an officer, his successor shall be elected at the same meeting. If this is so than the only one available for that vote would be the board members not the general membership

 

The board could remain in executive session for the election as well, or it could leave executive session after it finished removing the officer. It's up to the board. Executive session can be just a portion of a meeting.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If an officer is removed in executive session, which is secret, how can it be made known that the office is vacant without violating the secrecy of the executive session?

 

The membership being advised of a vacancy due to removal from office via a trial does not violate the rule that the proceedings themselves (the trial itself and what was said) will remain secret.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

...

If an officer is removed in executive session, which is secret, how can it be made known that the office is vacant without violating the secrecy of the executive session?

The membership being advised of a vacancy due to removal from office via a trial does not violate the rule that the proceedings themselves (the trial itself and what was said) will remain secret.

Perhaps to quibble:

In accordance with the bylaws, we are told, the removed officer was replaced in the same meeting. So the membership has no vacancy to find out about. They might wonder why someone occupies the office different from who the officer was yesterday. To which those privy to the executive session must reply, "We can't tell you."

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Perhaps to quibble:

In accordance with the bylaws, we are told, the removed officer was replaced in the same meeting. So the membership has no vacancy to find out about. They might wonder why someone occupies the office different from who the officer was yesterday. To which those privy to the executive session must reply, "We can't tell you."

 

The board may choose to disclose the fact that the board member had been removed if it wishes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...