Guest Bob Posted September 25, 2014 at 11:40 PM Report Share Posted September 25, 2014 at 11:40 PM My union e-board recently voted on whether to support legal representation of a union member on a legal matter. There are 14 members of the eboard. The vote was 5/7 to not support legal assistance. 1 person abstained from the vote due to a conflict of interest and another was not at the meeting. The person that abstained from the vote stated that even with the conflict of interest he would have voted to support legal assistance. My question is - should or do the 2 non votes count in favor of the union member's request. If they count to support legal representation then it would be a tie 7/7 and then the union president can vote who also stated he would support legal representation. ThanksBob Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris Harrison Posted September 25, 2014 at 11:45 PM Report Share Posted September 25, 2014 at 11:45 PM Generally speaking the results of a vote are calculated from those who actually voted on the question (abstentions are not votes and absentee voting isn't permitted unless the bylaws provide for it). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted September 26, 2014 at 12:00 AM Report Share Posted September 26, 2014 at 12:00 AM My question is - should or do the 2 non votes count in favor of the union member's request. No. Generally speaking the results of a vote are calculated from those who actually voted on the question (abstentions are not votes and absentee voting isn't permitted unless the bylaws provide for it). And even in the cases where abstentions and/or absentees would affect the result, they would have the same effect as votes against the motion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Brown Posted September 26, 2014 at 12:16 AM Report Share Posted September 26, 2014 at 12:16 AM My question is - should or do the 2 non votes count in favor of the union member's request. If they count to support legal representation then it would be a tie 7/7 and then the union president can vote who also stated he would support legal representation. Not that it would make any difference in this case, but unless you have a rule or bylaw provision to the contrary, under RONR the president not only can vote to break a tie, he can vote to CREATE a tie, which can cause a motion to fail. He can also vote to make or break a two-thirds vote. He can vote whenever his vote would affect the outcome. If your board elects to use the "small board rules" in RONR, which can be used by boards of no more than "about a dozen members", the president makes motions, debates, and votes just like the other members. RONR, pages 9-10 and 486-487 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Timothy Posted September 26, 2014 at 03:09 AM Report Share Posted September 26, 2014 at 03:09 AM It appears that the union president is not a member of the board, so this may be a case where the president is only allowed to vote if there is a tie. We know that is silly, but if that's what their bylaws say, then that's the way it is. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstackpo Posted September 26, 2014 at 04:25 AM Report Share Posted September 26, 2014 at 04:25 AM If your board elects to use the "small board rules" in RONR, which can be used by boards of no more than "about a dozen members", the president makes motions, debates, and votes just like the other members. RONR, pages 9-10 and 486-487 The wording on p. 487 makes it clear that the "small board rules" are the default for, well, small boards. There is no requirement that the Board "elect" to use them. Indeed, a small Board would have to elect to use the full formal rules if they wanted to, as applicable to assemblies in general. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.