Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

board election


Guest guest

Recommended Posts

If the members vote for them, then apparently the members don't mind.

 

As we have discussed about a single candidate running for multiple positions, this may or may not be the case.  For example, you may have voted for one to be Chairman, while I voted for the other being Treasurer.  This does not mean we want both elected.

 

However, unless there is a rule to the contrary, there is nothing that can be done to stop this.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

As we have discussed about a single candidate running for multiple positions, this may or may not be the case.  For example, you may have voted for one to be Chairman, while I voted for the other being Treasurer.  This does not mean we want both elected.

 

However, unless there is a rule to the contrary, there is nothing that can be done to stop this.

 

Well, it may not be that a majority of members favored both being on the board at the same time.  But it is true that both had majority support.

 

Without a rule, though, it would still be possible to avoid this situation by balloting for each office separately (in bylaws-listed order), so that the results of the election for Chairman were known before voting for Treasurer began.  This would put the spouse running for treasurer at a disadvantage; but life, I've heard it said, is unfair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...