Guest Ric Giumenta Posted December 5, 2014 at 04:53 PM Report Share Posted December 5, 2014 at 04:53 PM Do you need to have a bylaw change (vote from membershi) to remove a standing committee that has been established in the bylaws? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weldon Merritt Posted December 5, 2014 at 04:57 PM Report Share Posted December 5, 2014 at 04:57 PM Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kim Goldsworthy Posted December 5, 2014 at 09:41 PM Report Share Posted December 5, 2014 at 09:41 PM Do you need to have a bylaw change (vote from membershi) to remove a standing committee that has been established in the bylaws?Perhaps all you need to do is: Not appoint anyone.The committee will exist, but with zero members. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted December 5, 2014 at 11:28 PM Report Share Posted December 5, 2014 at 11:28 PM Perhaps all you need to do is: Not appoint anyone.The committee will exist, but with zero members.This is almost certainly in violation of the spirit of the bylaws, at the very least. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Brown Posted December 6, 2014 at 12:00 AM Report Share Posted December 6, 2014 at 12:00 AM Perhaps all you need to do is: Not appoint anyone.The committee will exist, but with zero members. This is almost certainly in violation of the spirit of the bylaws, at the very least.Perhaps, but it might well be the best solution until such time as the bylaws are amended to eliminate the committee....as should be done. Sometimes there just aren't enough volunteers to go around. I suppose, though, that members could be appointed to the committee with the understanding that they won't have to meet or do anything.....but is that any better than just not appointing the committee at all? Just to be clear, if they intend for this to be more or less a permanent "deletion" of the committee, the bylaws should be amended to delete it as a standing committee. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edgar Guest Posted December 6, 2014 at 12:04 AM Report Share Posted December 6, 2014 at 12:04 AM Sometimes there just aren't enough volunteers to go around. I suppose, though, that members could be appointed to the committee with the understanding that they won't have to meet or do anything.....but is that any better than just not appointing the committee at all? There's no indication that there's a lack of volunteers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Brown Posted December 6, 2014 at 12:28 AM Report Share Posted December 6, 2014 at 12:28 AM There's no indication that there's a lack of volunteers.And I didn't say there is. And there's no indication that volunteers are standing in line waiting to volunteer for this committee, either. I said it's a possibility. I would say it's a pretty good guess that one of two reasons is behind wanting to "disband" the committee: Either it isn't needed any more or there aren't enough people willing to serve on it. I threw out a possible reason for doing as Kim Goldsworthy suggested: Just don't appoint anyone to the committee. What's your solution? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rev Ed Posted December 6, 2014 at 01:01 AM Report Share Posted December 6, 2014 at 01:01 AM The temporary or 'quick' solution is to simply not appoint any members. Of course, depending on the rules of the By-laws, the Committee may automatically have members on it (for example, the President may be a member of all Committees except the Nominating Committee, and the Treasurer may be a member of the Finance Committee or Budget Committee.) The 'best' solution would be to amend the By-laws to delete the By-laws. This would be the 'best' solution if the membership really does not need the Committee anymore. However, if there is a chance that the Committee may be needed again in the future then it is best to simply not appoint any members for a year or two. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edgar Guest Posted December 6, 2014 at 01:13 AM Report Share Posted December 6, 2014 at 01:13 AM What's your solution? Amend the bylaws. As Mr. Merritt and, by implication, Mr. Martin said. I don't think this forum should be in the position of advising members to ignore their bylaws, however convenient it might be to do so. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Brown Posted December 6, 2014 at 01:18 AM Report Share Posted December 6, 2014 at 01:18 AM Amend the bylaws. As Mr. Merritt and, by implication, Mr. Martin said.And what to you propose that they do in the meantime? We ALL agree that they should amend the bylaws. No breaking news there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Lages Posted December 6, 2014 at 02:32 AM Report Share Posted December 6, 2014 at 02:32 AM I am always amazed when, after a complete and direct answer - as in post #2 - is given to a specific question, additional comments are posted which seem to take the situation in a rather sideways direction. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edgar Guest Posted December 6, 2014 at 02:49 AM Report Share Posted December 6, 2014 at 02:49 AM And what to you propose that they do in the meantime? In the meantime they should obey their bylaws. I would remind you that there's been no suggestion that there's any "problem" that requires a "solution". The OP simply asked if it was necessary to amend the bylaws in order to eliminate a standing committee established in the bylaws. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.