George Mervosh Posted April 24, 2015 at 01:34 PM Report Share Posted April 24, 2015 at 01:34 PM Instead of tacking this on to another thread like I originally did I'll ask this here: If the board grants non-member A the right to speak to a pending motion by the required 2/3 vote, but has set no time limit on how long he may speak, is the length still at the discretion of the assembly, or have they granted him the same length they are entitled to? In other words, can they cut him off mid-speech? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jstackpo Posted April 24, 2015 at 03:06 PM Report Share Posted April 24, 2015 at 03:06 PM You must be attending some fun meetings lately. I'd like to say the assembly could move to reconsider the "permission", but that might entail interrupting the speaker which would probably not be proper. Looks like you just grin & ... for ten minutes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted April 24, 2015 at 05:00 PM Author Report Share Posted April 24, 2015 at 05:00 PM You must be attending some fun meetings lately. Hardly. Our #1 goal is to avoid that kind of fun in real life meetings. However, my take on this is the 2/3 vote simply permits him to speak at all to the pending question, and the duration is indeed at the sufferance of the assembly. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted April 24, 2015 at 05:29 PM Report Share Posted April 24, 2015 at 05:29 PM I'd like to say the assembly could move to reconsider the "permission", but that might entail interrupting the speaker which would probably not be proper.I'm not so sure. So far as I can tell, no rule in RONR prohibits interrupting a non-member.Hardly. Our #1 goal is to avoid that kind of fun in real life meetings. However, my take on this is the 2/3 vote simply permits him to speak at all to the pending question, and the duration is indeed at the sufferance of the assembly.I think this is correct. While it may be rude to interrupt the non-member, I do not think it would violate any rule in RONR, and therefore, the assembly may step in to cut him off if and when it wishes to do so. It would, of course, be preferable to specify the length of time the non-member may speak when granting permission to do so, in order to avoid such awkward situations. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted April 24, 2015 at 08:20 PM Report Share Posted April 24, 2015 at 08:20 PM I think this is correct. While it may be rude to interrupt the non-member, I do not think it would violate any rule in RONR, and therefore, the assembly may step in to cut him off if and when it wishes to do so. It would, of course, be preferable to specify the length of time the non-member may speak when granting permission to do so, in order to avoid such awkward situations. Yeah, I'm reminded of how General Robert viewed such things in PL, beginning about two-thirds of the way down page 139 and continuing on to about two-thirds of the way down the next page. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted April 24, 2015 at 08:28 PM Author Report Share Posted April 24, 2015 at 08:28 PM Yeah, I'm reminded of how General Robert viewed such things in PL, beginning about two-thirds of the way down page 139 and continuing on to about two-thirds of the way down the next page. Very interesting and not surprising. Thanks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.