Guest Just Because Posted May 11, 2015 at 02:00 AM Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 at 02:00 AM Is one board member engaging in a public manner in psychological warfare during board meetings against another board member because of a personal grudge or vendetta be considered anything more serious than a breach of Decorum? Could it be defined as anything more serious than perhaps a personal attack? Based on this definition: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/psychological+warfarenoun1.the use of propaganda, threats, and other psychological techniques to mislead, intimidate, demoralize, or otherwise influence the thinking or behavior of an opponent.In this case it would be masked but purposeful threats (bordering on slander...so far) made in a public manner at a board meeting, designed to induce anxiety in a specific target and instill doubt about the target in everyone else's mind.Thanks for any help you can give... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hieu H. Huynh Posted May 11, 2015 at 02:27 AM Report Share Posted May 11, 2015 at 02:27 AM This question seems similar to the one posed in this thread. Perhaps the answers in that thread may be of use. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.