Guest Garden Club Member Posted May 15, 2015 at 02:36 PM Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 at 02:36 PM How can a vote that was taken in a committee (listed in policy and procedures of a club) be overturned or changed? Does the chairman of the committee have the power to change the vote and if so does the chairman need to advise the other members of the committee that the chairman has changed the vote. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Brown Posted May 15, 2015 at 02:40 PM Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 at 02:40 PM No, the chairman does not have the authority to change a motion adopted by the committee unless the bylaws or some special rule give him that authority. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Edgar Guest Posted May 15, 2015 at 02:41 PM Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 at 02:41 PM No, the chairman does not have the authority to change a motion adopted by the committee unless the bylaws or some special rule give him that authority. The motion was adopted? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 15, 2015 at 02:44 PM Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 at 02:44 PM No, the chairman does not have the authority to change a motion adopted by the committee unless the bylaws or some special rule give him that authority.Could you point me to the wording in Robert's Rules. Thank you for your comment Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Brown Posted May 15, 2015 at 02:45 PM Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 at 02:45 PM The motion was adopted?Good point. The original poster didn't say. It could also have been defeated. And the chairman couldn't change the outcome of that vote, either. :-) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 15, 2015 at 02:49 PM Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 at 02:49 PM Good point. The original poster didn't say. It could also have been defeated. And the chairman couldn't change the outcome of that vote, either. :-)The vote was 3 to 1 in favor to select a winner. After the meeting and without the knowledge of the 3 members that voted "for", the chairman changed winner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Brown Posted May 15, 2015 at 03:06 PM Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 at 03:06 PM The vote was 3 to 1 in favor to select a winner. After the meeting and without the knowledge of the 3 members that voted "for", the chairman changed winner. Perhaps the chairman should be removed as chairman or even removed from the committee. In addition, you might get a copy of RONR 11th edition and study Chapter XX: the chapter on discipline. It's 26 pages of detailed procedures. Possible "punishments" range from censure to expulsion. A good "talking to" by the president or by the other members of the committee might be all that is necessary. Did the chairman give a reason or justification for changing the winner? Even if he (or she) made a mistake in announcing the winner at the meeting, the chair's announcement usually stands unless challenged by a point of order. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Guest Posted May 15, 2015 at 03:14 PM Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 at 03:14 PM Perhaps the chairman should be removed as chairman or even removed from the committee. In addition, you might get a copy of RONR 11th edition and study Chapter XX: the chapter on discipline. It's 26 pages of detailed procedures. Possible "punishments" range from censure to expulsion. A good "talking to" by the president or by the other members of the committee might be all that is necessary. Did the chairman give a reason or justification for changing the winner? Even if he (or she) made a mistake in announcing the winner at the meeting, the chair's announcement usually stands unless challenged by a point of order.The person voted as the winner was told by the chairman that she was disqualified. The reason given is not valid actually unlawful in non-profits. Had the 3 other members of the committee had knowledge that the vote was being change we would have objected. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Brown Posted May 15, 2015 at 03:32 PM Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 at 03:32 PM The person voted as the winner was told by the chairman that she was disqualified. The reason given is not valid actually unlawful in non-profits. Had the 3 other members of the committee had knowledge that the vote was being change we would have objected.The chairman does not have the power, acting unilaterally and outside of a meeting, to take such action. At the next meeting the chairman can raise a point of order on his own that the winner does not meet the qualifications and is therefore disqualified. His ruling can be appealed to the rest of the committee. It takes a majority vote to overrule the chair. If the chair's ruling is upheld, it is then up to the committee, not the chairman, to select a new winner. The person who originally came in second is NOT automatically the winner. You vote again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted May 15, 2015 at 06:28 PM Report Share Posted May 15, 2015 at 06:28 PM The motion was adopted? Well, if the chair had the power to "change the vote" there would be no way to tell for sure. Fortunately, he doesn't. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.