Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Existing President Refused to report election vote count


Guest TonyK

Recommended Posts

Our non-profit corporation recently used a paper ballot for the election of the board position of president.  The election process itself followed the rules spelled out in the bylaws.  The ballots were counted by the current president (who was NOT running for the position) and the current secretary, and they announced the winner of the election.  I have no reason to believe there was any foul play with the election.  A few days later, just out of curiosity I asked the president what the vote count was (in a social setting), and he told me that since no one asked at the meeting, he preferred not to make that known.  This was very surprising to me, and now has me wondering what is going on.  I have not asked for this vote count at a regular meeting (we haven't had one yet since the election).  There is nothing in the bylaws about reporting the actual vote counts from the election.  We have always been a very "open" organization.  Now it doesn't feel that way, which I find very troubling.  My question - Is there a way to force this vote count to be reported at a meeting?  Can I make a motion at the next meeting to have the vote count reported, and if a majority approves do they have to report it?  I am not contesting the election results, I just want to know what the vote count was.  Can anyone provide guidance on this?  Or should I just drop it and move on? 

Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Our non-profit corporation recently used a paper ballot for the election of the board position of president.  The election process itself followed the rules spelled out in the bylaws.  The ballots were counted by the current president (who was NOT running for the position) and the current secretary, and they announced the winner of the election.  I have no reason to believe there was any foul play with the election.  A few days later, just out of curiosity I asked the president what the vote count was (in a social setting), and he told me that since no one asked at the meeting, he preferred not to make that known.  This was very surprising to me, and now has me wondering what is going on.  I have not asked for this vote count at a regular meeting (we haven't had one yet since the election).  There is nothing in the bylaws about reporting the actual vote counts from the election.  We have always been a very "open" organization.  Now it doesn't feel that way, which I find very troubling.  My question - Is there a way to force this vote count to be reported at a meeting?  Can I make a motion at the next meeting to have the vote count reported, and if a majority approves do they have to report it?  I am not contesting the election results, I just want to know what the vote count was.  Can anyone provide guidance on this?  Or should I just drop it and move on? 

Thanks

 

Reporting the vote count prior to declaring the results is required by RONR and the vote count is also reported in the minutes, by rule.  Next time, raise a point of order immediately, since the rules are being violated.

 

It's too late now to raise a point of order but I would make a Request for Information at the next meeting and ask, if you are still curious, yes. 

 

You might want to let the President know you won't be putting up with that failure to follow the rules in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A variation on what George M suggested:  When the minutes come up for approval next meeting, insist that the vote count be included, via an amendment to the draft minutes, since that is what the rules (RONR) call for.   I don't think this is "too late" as a point of order about a rule violation because you have no knowledge that the minutes were lacking until they were presented.

 

It is too late for a point that the president didn't read the results at the election meeting, but not, I'd argue, for their inclusion in the minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A variation on what George M suggested:  When the minutes come up for approval next meeting, insist that the vote count be included, via an amendment to the draft minutes, since that is what the rules (RONR) call for.   I don't think this is "too late" as a point of order about a rule violation because you have no knowledge that the minutes were lacking until they were presented.

 

It is too late for a point that the president didn't read the results at the election meeting, but not, I'd argue, for their inclusion in the minutes.

 

Yes, I think offering a correction to the minutes is indeed proper.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yes, I think offering a correction to the minutes is indeed proper.

 

I agree that the tellers' report should be included in the minutes, but doesn't that assume that a tellers' report was presented? If all that was reported was who won, then it seems to me that there is no other report to enter. We often tell others that the minutes should reflect what actually happened, not what should have happened, so why would this be any different?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"The tellers' report is entered in full in the minutes, becoming a part of the official records of the organization. Under no circumstances should this be omitted in an election. . ." (p. 418, ll. 26-28)

 

Regarding the content of the minutes, "When a count has been ordered or the vote is by ballot, the number of votes on each side should be entered. . ." (p. 470, ll. 29-30)

 

There doesn't seem to be a requirement that the counts be said in order to include them in the minutes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...