Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Speaking more than twice


Guest David

Recommended Posts

Is it possible for an organization to alter Robert's Rules?  Specifically, I am referring to the rule regarding the length or number of speeches in a debate.  Can provision be made to allow for a member to speak more than twice on a particular question on the same day?  (Section 4, page 43, line 5) 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I agree with Godelfan, but would point out that suspending the rule in RONR about being allowed to speak twice for up to ten minutes each time would have the effect of allowing unlimited debate on that question (or for the length of that session).  It it is desired to tighten, rather than loosen the rule, a motion to "limit or extend the limits of debate" should be adopted.  In this case, the motion would be to "limit debate" in whatever manner the assembly desires.  It would take a two thirds vote to adopt.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Guest David said:

Is it possible for an organization to alter Robert's Rules?  Specifically, I am referring to the rule regarding the length or number of speeches in a debate.  Can provision be made to allow for a member to speak more than twice on a particular question on the same day?  (Section 4, page 43, line 5) 

The footnote on page 43 refers you to Sections 15 and 52. My guess is that the rules in Section 15 are what you're looking for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Richard Brown said:

I . . . but would point out that suspending the rule in RONR about being allowed to speak twice for up to ten minutes each time would have the effect of allowing unlimited debate on that question (or for the length of that session). 

I don't know what you mean by this. In RONR, there's no such thing as simply "suspending the rule" about something without specifying the effect to be achieved.

"In making the incidental motion to Suspend the Rules, the particular rule or rules to be suspended are not mentioned; but the motion must state its specific purpose, and its adoption permits nothing else to be done under the suspension." (RONR, 11th ed., p. 262)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...