Guest Tom Posted July 11, 2017 at 03:25 PM Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 at 03:25 PM If a main motion is amended and a member has used the maximum number of speeches in debate, does he then have the opportunity to debate the main motion again? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bruce Lages Posted July 11, 2017 at 03:53 PM Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 at 03:53 PM I don't believe he does. Each member may speak twice on each debatable motion, so if this person had exhausted his right to debate the main motion before the amendment was proposed, he still would have been able to speak up to two times specifically on the amendment. But once the amendment has been adopted, he cannot speak again on the main motion. See RONR, p. 388-389 for the section entitled "NUMBER OF SPEECHES ON THE SAME QUESTION PER MEMBER PER DAY". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted July 11, 2017 at 04:01 PM Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 at 04:01 PM The passage Mr. Lages cites speaks specifically to your question: "Thus, if a series of debatable questions is pending and a member has, for example, spoken twice that day while the main motion is immediately pending, he has exhausted his right to debate the main motion; but, even on the same day, he can still speak twice on a motion to postpone the main question indefinitely, and twice on each amendment that may be moved, and so on." RONR (11th ed.), p. 389 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Tom Posted July 11, 2017 at 04:28 PM Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 at 04:28 PM Okay I thought that when the question was amended it is not the "same question" as the unamended main motion. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted July 11, 2017 at 05:03 PM Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 at 05:03 PM 36 minutes ago, Guest Tom said: Okay I thought that when the question was amended it is not the "same question" as the unamended main motion. If the member who has exhausted his right to debate the main motion (or main motion as amended) still opposes the motion after the amendments have been dealt with, he can move to postpone the main motion indefinitely if nothing else but the main motion is pending. Why would he do that? "Making this motion enables members who have exhausted their right of debate on the main question to speak further because, as explained under Standard Characteristic 5, the motion to Postpone Indefinitely, though technically a new question, necessarily involves debate of the main question." RONR (11th ed.), p. 128 So all may not be lost for this chatty member. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Brown Posted July 11, 2017 at 08:42 PM Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 at 08:42 PM The chatty member may also move to suspend the rules to allow him (or even all members) to speak again on the original main motion as amended. He might, for example, have originally been in favor of the motion but is now opposed to it as amended. Or vice versa. The motion to suspend the rules would require a two-thirds vote for adoption unless it is done without objection by unanimous consent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted July 11, 2017 at 10:29 PM Report Share Posted July 11, 2017 at 10:29 PM 1 hour ago, Richard Brown said: The chatty member may also move to suspend the rules to allow him (or even all members) to speak again on the original main motion as amended. He might, for example, have originally been in favor of the motion but is now opposed to it as amended. Or vice versa. The motion to suspend the rules would require a two-thirds vote for adoption unless it is done without objection by unanimous consent. Given the specifics of the situation, I'd think this would be a motion to Extend Limits of Debate rather than a motion to suspend the rules. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
George Mervosh Posted July 12, 2017 at 12:16 PM Report Share Posted July 12, 2017 at 12:16 PM 15 hours ago, Richard Brown said: The chatty member may also move to suspend the rules to allow him (or even all members) to speak again on the original main motion as amended. He might, for example, have originally been in favor of the motion but is now opposed to it as amended. Or vice versa. The motion to suspend the rules would require a two-thirds vote for adoption unless it is done without objection by unanimous consent. I agree with Josh Martin regarding what motion it really is. But if the member who can no longer debate the main motion (or main motion as amended) opposes the motion, it's probably easier to move to postpone indefinitely since all that's required is a second by another member and he can debate that motion, rather than hope he can garner a 2/3 vote to extend the limits of debate. If he favors the main motion, that's a different story. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted July 12, 2017 at 01:04 PM Report Share Posted July 12, 2017 at 01:04 PM Another alternative, if the member is in favor of the main motion as amended, would be to move that the question be considered informally, which will require only a majority vote for its adoption. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts