Guest Will Posted September 23, 2017 at 05:22 PM Report Share Posted September 23, 2017 at 05:22 PM At an upcoming annual meeting, where by laws can be changed, there are going to be two different sets of proposed by law changes. Some of them are in direct conflict with each other. Is there a correct procedure for the presentation of the proposed changes? The concern is for the ones that are in direct conflict with each other. One group wants to change an area one way, and the other group wants to change it a different way. Should they be presented at the same time for the general assembly to choose? Allow questions, etc. Then vote on each one? Any help here is greatly appreciated. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted September 23, 2017 at 06:04 PM Report Share Posted September 23, 2017 at 06:04 PM Since this are "two set" this sounds like a bylaw revision, I would suggest that one set should be taken up, "in logical order," much like filling blanks (see pp. 593-4, pp.164-5). Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted September 23, 2017 at 06:18 PM Report Share Posted September 23, 2017 at 06:18 PM 54 minutes ago, Guest Will said: At an upcoming annual meeting, where by laws can be changed, there are going to be two different sets of proposed by law changes. Some of them are in direct conflict with each other. Is there a correct procedure for the presentation of the proposed changes? The concern is for the ones that are in direct conflict with each other. One group wants to change an area one way, and the other group wants to change it a different way. Should they be presented at the same time for the general assembly to choose? Allow questions, etc. Then vote on each one? Any help here is greatly appreciated. Guest Will, I suggest you look at what is said under PROCEDURE OF CONSIDERATION on pages 593-94 of RONR, 11th ed. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts