Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Not Voting vs Abstaining


Guest David Dick
 Share

Recommended Posts

Guest Continued question

1. Is the Chair "abstaining" when he/she doesn't vote on a matter or is the Chair simply "not voting" because the bylaws prohibit it.

2. If the Chair is "abstaining," should there be a notation such as "Chair not voting" or something similar when it is noted in the minutes?

Thanks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Guest Continued question said:

1. Is the Chair "abstaining" when he/she doesn't vote on a matter or is the Chair simply "not voting" because the bylaws prohibit it.

2. If the Chair is "abstaining," should there be a notation such as "Chair not voting" or something similar when it is noted in the minutes?

1. If the bylaws prohibit the chair from voting unless to make or break a tie, this is not an abstention. An abstention is to voluntarily refrain from voting. If the chair has the right to vote, but does not do so by custom, then it is an abstention.

2. You say that your bylaws require a reason, and “chair not voting” doesn’t include a reason. If it turns out that this is an abstention, I would say “The chair did not vote due to custom.”

4 hours ago, Joshua Katz said:

1.  The chair is abstaining, at least as far as RONR.  If the chair has no RIGHT to vote under your bylaws, then they're not abstaining.  I don't know that it really matters.

2.  No, abstentions are not noted in the minutes.  The minutes should simply say that the motion was adopted/not adopted.

But Mr. Katz, the OP stated that “Our bylaws also require that a reason be noted in the minutes for all abstentions.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/10/2017 at 7:29 PM, Josh Martin said:

1. If the bylaws prohibit the chair from voting unless to make or break a tie, this is not an abstention. An abstention is to voluntarily refrain from voting. If the chair has the right to vote, but does not do so by custom, then it is an abstention.

2. You say that your bylaws require a reason, and “chair not voting” doesn’t include a reason. If it turns out that this is an abstention, I would say “The chair did not vote due to custom.”

But if the bylaws explicitly provide that the chair may not vote, that seems to me to be more than mere custom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/10/2017 at 7:29 PM, Josh Martin said:

... But Mr. Katz, the OP stated that “Our bylaws also require that a reason be noted in the minutes for all abstentions.”

All that that means is that the minutes are required to say why the chair abstained, without mentioning that he or she didn't.

(It's a finely nuanced point, I'll grant.)

Edited by Gary c Tesser
clarification
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Gary Novosielski said:

I wonder: If the bylaws say that the reason for abstentions must be recorded, would I as a member automatically have a duty to give a reason, and could I be compelled to offer one?  

If the bylaws simply say that the reason for abstentions must be recorded, I suppose that the secretary will record that members abstained because they didn't want to vote. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This thread is getting silly.

RONR says, "RIGHT OF ABSTENTION. Although it is the duty of every member who has an opinion on a question to express it by his vote, he can abstain, since he cannot be compelled to vote." (p. 407)

Apparently this organization feels that by having a reason for all abstentions recorded in the minutes, it will discourage unnecessary abstentions. Any further speculation about how this rule might be enforced should probably await our receipt of the actual language (which will probably never happen), but I'm fairly confident that having or not having a pet llama is not a valid reason for abstaining in 99.999999999999% of all cases. I also don't think that the secretary should assume that any members abstained because they didn't want to vote. Maybe they wanted to but were just too lazy, or maybe they weren't paying enough attention when the chair put the question. Or maybe they had, you know, an actual reason.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...