Jump to content
The Official RONR Q & A Forums

Uncontested electioins


Guest Heather

Recommended Posts

No.  There is no need to leave the chair.

The presiding officer, in the event that there is but one nominee for an office should declare the person elected by acclamation.  

If, however, the bylaws required a ballot vote for elections, and do not provide an exception for uncontested elections, then a ballot vote must be held, even if there is but a single name on it.  As with all ballots, a line should be provided for write-ins.  This rule cannot be suspended even by a unanimous vote.

Edited by Gary Novosielski
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Guest Heather said:

In an uncontested election, must the president vacate the chair to declare the vote taken without ballot?

No, and in fact, there is no need for the President to vacate the chair even if the election is contested (assuming the President does not speak in debate on the election).

”Whenever a motion is made that refers only to the presiding officer in a capacity not shared in common with other members, or that commends or censures him with others, he should turn the chair over to the vice-president or appropriate temporary occupant (see below) during the assembly's consideration of that motion, just as he would in a case where he wishes to take part in debate (see also pp. 394–95). The chair, however, should not hesitate to put the question on a motion to elect officers or appoint delegates or a committee even if he is included.” (RONR, 11th ed., pgs. 451-452)

Edited by Josh Martin
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
×
  • Create New...