Guest Malissa Posted July 7, 2021 at 12:09 AM Report Share Posted July 7, 2021 at 12:09 AM There is a non-profit that has an auxiliary board. The auxiliary exist to serve the hospitality needs of the non-profit. We don’t fund raise and the income used for expenses comes from the dues the members pay. There has continuously been one individual who happens to be a paid staff member of the non-profit that has sat on the auxiliary board for numerous years. Is it a conflict for this paid staff member to sit on the auxiliary board? This person has influenced and voted for things that benefit the non-profit money wise. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weldon Merritt Posted July 7, 2021 at 02:23 AM Report Share Posted July 7, 2021 at 02:23 AM 2 hours ago, Guest Malissa said: There is a non-profit that has an auxiliary board. The auxiliary exist to serve the hospitality needs of the non-profit. We don’t fund raise and the income used for expenses comes from the dues the members pay. There has continuously been one individual who happens to be a paid staff member of the non-profit that has sat on the auxiliary board for numerous years. Is it a conflict for this paid staff member to sit on the auxiliary board? This person has influenced and voted for things that benefit the non-profit money wise. No rule in RONR would prevent it. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted July 11, 2021 at 04:31 AM Report Share Posted July 11, 2021 at 04:31 AM On 7/6/2021 at 8:09 PM, Guest Malissa said: There is a non-profit that has an auxiliary board. The auxiliary exist to serve the hospitality needs of the non-profit. We don’t fund raise and the income used for expenses comes from the dues the members pay. There has continuously been one individual who happens to be a paid staff member of the non-profit that has sat on the auxiliary board for numerous years. Is it a conflict for this paid staff member to sit on the auxiliary board? This person has influenced and voted for things that benefit the non-profit money wise. RONR suggests that members "should" (but cannot be compelled to) abstain on matters in which they have a personal or pecuniary interest not in common with other members. Matters that benefit the entire organization in general would appear to me to be in the common interest. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts