Tomm Posted February 14, 2023 at 02:19 PM Report Share Posted February 14, 2023 at 02:19 PM I realize that RONR discourages the use of Co-Chair but I'm wondering how one should view the positions of Chair and Co-Chair? Should the Chair really be viewed as a superior position over the Co-Chair or should he/she be viewed simply as a co-equal to the co-chair, both having equal powers? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dan Honemann Posted February 14, 2023 at 02:25 PM Report Share Posted February 14, 2023 at 02:25 PM On 2/14/2023 at 9:19 AM, Tomm said: I realize that RONR discourages the use of Co-Chair but I'm wondering how one should view the positions of Chair and Co-Chair? Should the Chair really be viewed as a superior position over the Co-Chair or should he/she be viewed simply as a co-equal to the co-chair, both having equal powers? You will not find an answer to this question in RONR. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Weldon Merritt Posted February 14, 2023 at 02:55 PM Report Share Posted February 14, 2023 at 02:55 PM On 2/14/2023 at 7:25 AM, Dan Honemann said: You will not find an answer to this question in RONR. So if your organization insists on having them despite the advice in RONR, your rules should also spell out the relationship. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Brown Posted February 14, 2023 at 04:40 PM Report Share Posted February 14, 2023 at 04:40 PM On 2/14/2023 at 8:55 AM, Weldon Merritt said: So if your organization insists on having them despite the advice in RONR, your rules should also spell out the relationship. And if your rules don't spell out the relationship, your membership will have to figure it out for itself. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted February 14, 2023 at 06:04 PM Report Share Posted February 14, 2023 at 06:04 PM On 2/14/2023 at 9:19 AM, Tomm said: I realize that RONR discourages the use of Co-Chair but I'm wondering how one should view the positions of Chair and Co-Chair? Should the Chair really be viewed as a superior position over the Co-Chair or should he/she be viewed simply as a co-equal to the co-chair, both having equal powers? It not only discourages the practice, it makes no provisions for co-officers at all, so you do not have any, unless your bylaws explicitly permit them. As to how they should be viewed, if your bylaws are silent, they should be viewed as non-existent. If your bylaws contain provisions allowing them, then they should be viewed according to the customized rules in your bylaws. If you in fact have a Chair and a Co-chair, rather that two true Co-chairs, you should amend your bylaws to change the title of Co-chair to Vice-Chair, and your problem will be resolved. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted February 14, 2023 at 07:09 PM Report Share Posted February 14, 2023 at 07:09 PM On 2/14/2023 at 8:19 AM, Tomm said: I realize that RONR discourages the use of Co-Chair but I'm wondering how one should view the positions of Chair and Co-Chair? "Discourages" is perhaps putting it mildly. On 2/14/2023 at 8:19 AM, Tomm said: Should the Chair really be viewed as a superior position over the Co-Chair or should he/she be viewed simply as a co-equal to the co-chair, both having equal powers? This will vary from organization to organization and will depend upon the organization's rules and customs. I have seen organizations where it is indeed intended that the positions be "co-equal." I have also seen organizations where the Co-Chair (or one of the Co-Chairs) is effectively a Vice Chair with a different title. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts