Guest Biology Faculty Posted April 5, 2023 at 06:11 PM Report Share Posted April 5, 2023 at 06:11 PM We are implementing Robert's Rules to help our department meetings go more smoothly. I think the rule that requires all the chance the speak before any individual speaks twice is something that could really work for us. I know interruptions are forbidden under most circumstances, as well. We do, however, have some really long winded, repetitive people who tend to hold up progress. Any tips on how to help rein them in appropriately and keep things moving along? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
J. J. Posted April 5, 2023 at 06:42 PM Report Share Posted April 5, 2023 at 06:42 PM You can establish rules limiting the time for debate. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josh Martin Posted April 5, 2023 at 06:43 PM Report Share Posted April 5, 2023 at 06:43 PM On 4/5/2023 at 1:11 PM, Guest Biology Faculty said: We do, however, have some really long winded, repetitive people who tend to hold up progress. Any tips on how to help rein them in appropriately and keep things moving along? RONR has time limits on how long members may speak. And the assembly is free to adopt a rule providing for a shorter limit if it wishes to do so. "In a nonlegislative body or organization that has no special rule relating to the length of speeches, a member, having obtained the floor while a debatable motion is immediately pending, can speak no longer than ten minutes unless he obtains the consent of the assembly." RONR (12th ed.) 43:8 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gary Novosielski Posted April 7, 2023 at 11:20 PM Report Share Posted April 7, 2023 at 11:20 PM Also, the person having the floor must limit all remarks to those that are germane to the current pending motion. If these members start to wander off-topic to matters that don't bear on the merits of the motion, the chair can remind them of this requirement, or a member may raise a Point of Order that the discussion has departed from what is germane. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Richard Brown Posted April 11, 2023 at 05:56 PM Report Share Posted April 11, 2023 at 05:56 PM Agreeing with my colleagues, I would suggest your organization adopt a special rule of order limiting speeches in debate to something like three minutes. I've seen rules that permit only one minute, but in my opinion, that is a bit too short. The ten minutes per speech permitted in RONR is simply too long for most organizations. On those rare occasions when a speaker is making really good points or a really good explanation on a complicated issue, the assembly can always grant the speaker some additional time by a two-thirds vote (or unanimous consent). See section 15 in RONR (12th ed.) titled "Limit or Extend Limits of Debate". Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rob Elsman Posted April 11, 2023 at 08:15 PM Report Share Posted April 11, 2023 at 08:15 PM I agree with @Richard Brown that many ordinary societies will usually find the ten-minute rule too much to bear. A motion to adopt a special rule of order is a form of a main motion; it requires a second; it is debatable and amendable; and, its adoption requires either (a) previous notice and a two-thirds vote, or (b) a majority vote of the entire membership (with or without previous notice). See RONR (12th ed.) t6, motion 7. If there are several suggestions for the number of minutes, the device known as filling blanks may be used to arrive at the assembly's best judgment. See RONR (12th ed.) 12:92-113. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts