Guest J. J. Posted March 11, 2010 at 01:08 AM Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 at 01:08 AM Yes. J. J." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JDStackpole Posted March 11, 2010 at 01:12 AM Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 at 01:12 AM Yes. RONR "tinted" page 18, # 49." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cliffy Posted March 11, 2010 at 01:32 AM Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 at 01:32 AM Thank you gentlemen!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dan Posted March 11, 2010 at 03:47 PM Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 at 03:47 PM What exactly is debated? The prospective's nominee's ballot worthiness? The prospect's worthiness to serve in the relevant position? How does this work? I see on page 18 that you are correct. I'm just wondering how this works in practice." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest George Mervosh Posted March 11, 2010 at 04:02 PM Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 at 04:02 PM You can debate their qualifications, or lack thereof. So make yourself a list of good and not so good qualifications. Decorum is key..... It's not improper to point out the candidate for Treasurer was convicted of embezzling, bu" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chris H Posted March 11, 2010 at 04:07 PM Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 at 04:07 PM Yes. However, care needs to be taken to stay within decorum (no personal attacks on another member). In practice touting the qualification of the nominee you support over the qualifications of the others is the safest way to stay out of danger of violat" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dan Posted March 11, 2010 at 04:11 PM Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 at 04:11 PM Thanks. I hope cliffy sees your remarks." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted March 11, 2010 at 04:51 PM Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 at 04:51 PM In my early days here on the forum I posted a question about "furtherance", a procedure at the national level of our organization during which nominees and nominators discussed the merits of said nominee's "candidacy". No one here had " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted March 11, 2010 at 07:40 PM Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 at 07:40 PM "It's not improper to point out the candidate for Treasurer was convicted of embezzling, but you can't call him a criminal." I disagree that applying nouns like "embezzler", "criminal", "felon", "ex-co" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest cliffy Posted March 11, 2010 at 11:42 PM Report Share Posted March 11, 2010 at 11:42 PM Thanks to all that posted. Would it be a breach of decorum if it was pointed out that a particular nominee had accused several present BOD members of being "pawns" (by name) in a blog that he posted? Or during committee action made an accusa" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 12, 2010 at 03:39 AM Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 at 03:39 AM >>I'm curious as to how far I can go to prevent this persons possible election!<< As far as the assembly will let you. What's acceptable at a church meeting is not necessarily what's acceptable at a celebrity roast." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest J. J. Posted March 12, 2010 at 04:18 AM Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 at 04:18 AM >> disagree that applying nouns like "embezzler", "criminal", "felon", "ex-con", etc., to a convicted embezzler standing for election to the office of treasurer breaches decorum. Because his history as an embe" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Gary c Tesser Posted March 12, 2010 at 07:26 AM Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 at 07:26 AM Different consensus a few years ago." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John M. Posted March 12, 2010 at 06:33 PM Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 at 06:33 PM >>Would it be a breach of decorum if it was pointed out that a particular nominee had accused several present BOD members of being "pawns" (by name) in a blog that he posted? Or during committee action made an accusation of a vendor being " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.