Guest George Mervosh Posted March 12, 2010 at 01:49 PM Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 at 01:49 PM What is his own procedure?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BBQ Posted March 12, 2010 at 02:31 PM Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 at 02:31 PM 1. C&BL's require sequentially numbered ballots, color other than white, placed in a box held by the tellers. 2. His procedure - preprinted ballots (no numbers,collected tellers (no box)." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest George Mervosh Posted March 12, 2010 at 02:37 PM Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 at 02:37 PM Well, your facts are sketchy, but if the member's vote was indeed secret, the other violations would have required a timely point of order. It's all too late now." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BBQ Posted March 12, 2010 at 03:49 PM Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 at 03:49 PM Thanks...sounds like secrecy was protected (even though C&BL's were not followed, Point of Order was not raised and therefore it is a legal vote. Some of the assembly feel the moderator (or assembly) does not have the authority to violate the C&am" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest George Mervosh Posted March 12, 2010 at 03:52 PM Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 at 03:52 PM Well they have it half right...he can't violate the rules...next time call him on it right away." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 12, 2010 at 05:30 PM Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 at 05:30 PM >>color other than white<< Really??? Whatever for?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Robert B. Fish Posted March 12, 2010 at 05:38 PM Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 at 05:38 PM It be more difficult for someone to stuff the ballot box if they didn't know the color of the ballots. Teal one time, off-white the next. I'll bet this organization has had trouble along this line in the past. Good lessons here, IMHO. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BBQ Posted March 12, 2010 at 05:49 PM Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 at 05:49 PM H Wm I have no idea...Bob is correct a legacy issue with former voting. The real question is when is it okay not follow C&BL's." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chris H Posted March 12, 2010 at 05:59 PM Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 at 05:59 PM "The real question is when is it okay not follow C&BL's." The short answer is almost never. The long(er) answer is that there might be a time where there is some appliable rule or law that would supersede the C&BLs and there is" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John M. Posted March 12, 2010 at 07:36 PM Report Share Posted March 12, 2010 at 07:36 PM >>The real question is when is it okay not follow C&BL's.<< -If the Constitution and Bylaws are in conflict with an even higher level rule (Articles of Incorporation, procedural rules in applicable law). -If the rule is i" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.