Guest J. J. Posted March 15, 2010 at 04:01 AM Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 at 04:01 AM Assuming that the special is permitted and properly called, and the question is postponed to a meeting within the quarterly time period, yes. J. J." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 15, 2010 at 09:43 AM Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 at 09:43 AM And you're not just "delaying the vote", you're postponing consideration of the question (which, while it may eventually include a vote, also includes debate and any other disposition of the motion)." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Don Lockett Posted March 15, 2010 at 03:05 PM Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 at 03:05 PM Thank you. What is the basis for having the next meeting within the quarterly time period?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JDStackpole Posted March 15, 2010 at 03:22 PM Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 at 03:22 PM RONR says so! So there!! I suppose it is in recognition of (average) human attention span. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest J. J. Posted March 15, 2010 at 03:32 PM Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 at 03:32 PM Pages 175-6. J. J." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 15, 2010 at 03:48 PM Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 at 03:48 PM And the "quarterly time period" is just RONR's arcane way of saying three months (more or less). It does not mean fifteen minutes. Or once every four years. Nor is it the same as the NBA's quarterly time period: twelve minutes." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jim Cords Posted March 15, 2010 at 07:07 PM Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 at 07:07 PM See posts re: Single Item Meeting." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Don Lockett Posted March 15, 2010 at 08:28 PM Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 at 08:28 PM Please move this discussion to the thread of posts re: Single Item Meeting. Thank you. It is becoming interesting." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Don Lockett Posted March 15, 2010 at 10:49 PM Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 at 10:49 PM In moving to the posts re: Single Item Meeting, please be aware that the meeting being referred to is not a regularly scheduled meeting; therefore, I believe that the rules on page 175 which speak to a quarterly time interval are moot because there is no" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 15, 2010 at 10:56 PM Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 at 10:56 PM So which is it? If you are "moving" to the other post (though there really is no such process) why are you continuing to add facts on this post? Perhaps the two of you should get your act together and select one to present your" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Don Lockett Posted March 15, 2010 at 11:40 PM Report Share Posted March 15, 2010 at 11:40 PM Point taken. Please accept my apology. I had an afterthought about making clear that this was a special meeting. Thank you. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.