Guest Rob Elsman Posted March 16, 2010 at 11:21 PM Report Share Posted March 16, 2010 at 11:21 PM Your question seems to have more to do with your association's bylaws than anything in RONR." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 17, 2010 at 09:51 AM Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 at 09:51 AM >>I assume 50%+1 applies<< The default requirement is a majority (more than half). That's not the same thing as "50%+1". >>I can not pin point anything in the bylaws or Roberts Rules to back up my feelings, ye" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Trina Posted March 17, 2010 at 10:38 AM Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 at 10:38 AM The problem may have to do with the fact that organizations are totally free to adopt flawed bylaws. If there is truly ambiguity in the bylaws, RONR does provide some principles of interpretation (pp. 570-573). The current situation is probably n" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dan Honemann Posted March 17, 2010 at 10:50 AM Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 at 10:50 AM >>Please help, can anyone provide some Roberts Rules direction?<< The rule in Robert's Rules of Order is that expulsion from membership requires a two-thirds vote (RONR, 10th ed., p. 628, l. 12-13; p. 640, l. 12-13). Whether " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted March 17, 2010 at 06:16 PM Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 at 06:16 PM Thomas M. A question of logic. You said: • bylaws state that a vote threshold of a 2/3 vote can remove a director (but this rule fails to mention the body responsible). • bylaws state that the board is the body r" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Brian Posted March 17, 2010 at 06:33 PM Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 at 06:33 PM I'm a first time responder, so take this with a grain of salt, but... RRoO gives criteria for interpreting bylaw, such as they cannot be interpreted in a way that totally makes another bylaw not make sense. All of that being said, it's h" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.