Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 17, 2010 at 12:15 PM Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 at 12:15 PM The best way to support your argument is to cite the rule that supports it, whether that rule is in your bylaws or in RONR. Credentials are no guarantee that the answers are correct, nor is the lack thereof a guarantee that the answers are not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest JDStackpole Posted March 17, 2010 at 12:32 PM Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 at 12:32 PM But some of the regulars are more right than others. ;-) No "rightness" filters available, however. Enjoy!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest George Mervosh Posted March 17, 2010 at 12:33 PM Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 at 12:33 PM If the forum doesn't cut it for your group, they can hire someone. Contact either (or both) the ... National Association of Parliamentarians 213 South Main St. Independence, MO 64050-3850 Phone: 888-627-2929 Fax: 816" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Chris H Posted March 17, 2010 at 12:48 PM Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 at 12:48 PM "And if you've hung around here for awhile, you'll see that even the "regulars" frequently disagree on the application of a particular rule." I enjoy reading those disagreements because when you have one folks tend to delve de" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Trina Posted March 17, 2010 at 12:52 PM Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 at 12:52 PM Some of the posters are professional parliamentarians. Some are aspiring parliamentarians. One of the regular posters is one of the authors of RONR. Others (such as myself) are interested amateurs with no professional background at all. It's a mi" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
David A Foulkes Posted March 17, 2010 at 01:11 PM Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 at 01:11 PM And as is often suggested here, should someone in your group say "No - I'M right" you might ask THEM to back it, particularly with citations from The Book. The best defense....." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Kim Goldsworthy Posted March 17, 2010 at 06:05 PM Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 at 06:05 PM Janet, In general: • Some responders are members of ONE or BOTH of the two major parliamentary societies in the United States. • Some of THOSE members have chosen to take tests to add a credential to their resume/portfolio. " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 17, 2010 at 06:11 PM Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 at 06:11 PM >>Some responders are NOT read The Book<< And then there are those . . . " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Dan Honemann Posted March 17, 2010 at 06:21 PM Report Share Posted March 17, 2010 at 06:21 PM Janet, the CAUTION that you quoted means exactly what it says, and Mr. Mountcastle's response (the first one you received) is quite correct." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.