Guest H.Wm.Mountcastle Posted March 18, 2010 at 03:25 PM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 03:25 PM All that and no question. Talk about being frustrated." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jay John Posted March 18, 2010 at 03:45 PM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 03:45 PM Thanks for 'gentle' reproach? approach? but I must confess that I'm so new to RRO that I don't understand or have forgotten what raising the question means (IF that's the correct terminology, don't recall. My Bad.) Please enlighten us frustrated " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jay John Posted March 18, 2010 at 03:53 PM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 03:53 PM Original Message: Thanks for 'gentle' reproach? approach? but I must confess that I'm so new to RRO that I don't understand or have forgotten what raising the question means (IF that's the correct terminology, don't recall. My Bad.) Please en" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted March 18, 2010 at 03:55 PM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 03:55 PM Read the section in RONR on committee reports, §51, pp. 485. Note that the reporting member presents the committee's report and moves the adoption of the recommendations contained there (assuming, of course, that any required previous notice has been" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jay John Posted March 18, 2010 at 04:33 PM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 04:33 PM Our Amendment Comm Chair looked up everything about "question" in RRO newly revised edition & seems to both of us that the question would once again not only open up for 1st & 2nd Motions but also with more lengthy discussion. Remember " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted March 18, 2010 at 04:37 PM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 04:37 PM As far as I understand it, the question is still in the control of the general assembly. If I'm right about the facts, "we" (the committee?) are out of business with respect to this matter. The committee's continuing interference after discharge" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jay John Posted March 18, 2010 at 04:45 PM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 04:45 PM We're not wanting to be insubordiante. Actually, at the March meeting the general assembly asked the committee to meet again, incorporate the changes recommended by members at the gen. assembly then reprint the amendments again with the changes wanted by" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted March 18, 2010 at 04:50 PM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 04:50 PM "Actually, at the March meeting the general assembly asked the committee to meet again, incorporate the changes recommended by members at the gen. assembly then reprint the amendments again with the changes wanted by the membership then at the April " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Rob Elsman Posted March 18, 2010 at 04:59 PM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 04:59 PM By the way, the committee can certainly follow its instruction to print up something for distribution. For example, the two texts might be shown side-by-side to show what would be pending were the amendment adopted or rejected." Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jay John Posted March 18, 2010 at 06:39 PM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 06:39 PM Help anyone?" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Jay John Posted March 18, 2010 at 06:45 PM Report Share Posted March 18, 2010 at 06:45 PM sorry about the omission; thanks for all your work it took to help us. I appreciate it. Jay John" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest John M. Posted March 19, 2010 at 04:38 PM Report Share Posted March 19, 2010 at 04:38 PM >>and then ask for a vote without more lengthy discussion and without waiting another 30 days?<< You don't need to wait another 30 days unless any amendments exceed the scope of the notice. However, as Mr. Elsman notes, the committee " Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.